Menu
But during the "accident investigation", Weatherington said he was the driver of the car. When the officer testified at trial, he told the jury about Weatherinton's DUI accident investigation statements. There was another witness who saw Weatherington in the driver's seat, but that was after the crash. The only evidence presented at trial of Weatherinton driving was an admission he made to the officer during the "accident investigation". (In any DUI, there must be real proof that you were the driver of the car - it's called a wheel witness). Weatherington was convicted of Felony DUI. (this was his 3rd DUI - it became a Felony based on prior DUI convictions). He was sentenced to 3 years in prison and he appealed his conviction. The Appeals Court threw out the conviction and ordered a new trial. The Court said that the statement made during the accident investigation shouldn't have been used against Weatherington at trial. It was made before the DUI investigation began. His felony DUI conviction was reversed. In this case, the officer investigated the traffic accident and took Weatherington's statements. But he never advised the Defendant that he was conducting a criminal investigation and did not read him Miranda warnings. The officer never "switched hats". That would have allowed the DUI Crash Investigation statements to be admissible at trial. This is a basic example of why you need to talk to an experienced DUI attorney, if you are arrested. Admitting to DUI after a crash may not mean you will be found guilty. In fact in may not even hurt your case at all. Contact us today at (727) 372-3111
© 2026 Law Offices of Pawuk & Pawuk
| View Our Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
Law Firm Website Design by The Modern Firm